John Sandstrøm - Norwegian psychologist. Article “John Sandstrøm” in Norwegian Wikipedia has 22.3 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 6 references and 1 sections.
Since the creation of article “John Sandstrøm”, its content was written by 14 registered users of Norwegian Wikipedia and edited by 14 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 3 times in Norwegian Wikipedia and cited 3 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Norwegian: #32549 03.2014 |
Global: #3237768 03.2014 |
| Best Rank | Norwegian: #2711 08.2014 |
Global: #467051 02.2007 |
On 16 March 2026 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: 98th Academy Awards, Michael B. Jordan, Sinners, Jessie Buckley, Paul Thomas Anderson, Sean Penn, One Battle After Another, Amy Madigan, Hamnet, Timothée Chalamet.
In Norwegian Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Forside, Joachim Trier, Affeksjonsverdi (film), Renate Reinsve, Kvenfolkets dag, Sturla Henriksbø, Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas, Aylar Lie, Elle Fanning, Erik Poppe.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(2.57+4.92+0+4+100)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
